Mohammad Yunus’s controversial statement on India’s Northeast unites BJP and Congress
Introduction
Hello friends, I’m Harsh, and today, I’ve got some juicy news that’s got everyone talking! Recently, Bangladesh’s interim government leader, Mohammad Yunus, visited China and dropped a statement about India’s Northeast states that’s causing a stir. For the first time in ages, I’m seeing a rare unity—whether it’s BJP, Congress, or anyone in or out of government—they’re all singing the same tune! They’re saying Mohammad Yunus’s policy is super dangerous for India, and we need to give him a proper response. He can’t just talk about our states like that! Let’s dive in, friends!
Table of Contents
What Did Mohammad Yunus Say? The Statement That Sparked a Fire
So, what’s all the fuss about? Mohammad Yunus, the so-called interim leader of Bangladesh, made waves during his China visit. In a clip, he commented on India’s Northeast, calling the Seven Sister states—Assam, Arunachal Pradesh, Manipur, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Nagaland, and Tripura—“landlocked” and even hinted that Bangladesh is the “guardian of the ocean” for the region. This has lit a firestorm!
Assam’s Chief Minister, Himanta Biswa Sarma, was quick to react, labeling it “offensive.” He pointed out that Yunus’s interim government itself is under scrutiny—its legitimacy is shaky after the 2024 political upheaval that ousted Sheikh Hasina. Sarma went further, saying Yunus’s remarks suggest a dangerous agenda, especially with the Siliguri Corridor—often called the Chicken Neck—under threat. This narrow strip, just 22 kilometers wide, connects Northeast India to the rest of the country. Historically, it’s been a strategic hotspot, and Sarma’s warning echoes concerns raised by India’s National Security Advisor, Ajit Doval, about external interference.
The Siliguri Corridor – Why It’s a Big Deal?
Let’s zoom in on this Siliguri Corridor. Sarma’s spot on—it’s critical. This corridor links West Bengal to the Northeast, and any threat to it could physically cut off seven states from India. He’s calling for stronger infrastructure—more railways, roads, and even alternative routes. The Kaladan Multimodal Transit Transport Project, a $484 million initiative, is already in play, connecting West Bengal’s Sittwe Port in Myanmar to Northeast India, bypassing Siliguri. It’s a game-changer, with 70% completion as of 2025, per the Ministry of External Affairs.
Sarma also suggested engineering challenges shouldn’t stop innovation—think underground tunnels or fortified walls. Experts at the Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses agree, noting China’s 2020 claim on Arunachal Pradesh adds urgency. Yunus’s “guardian” remark feels like an invite to China to meddle, and that’s got everyone on edge.
A Dangerous Agenda? The Strategic Angle
Sarma’s not mincing words—he sees Yunus’s statement as part of a broader strategy to harm India. He hinted at internal elements, possibly insurgent groups in the Northeast, aligning with external powers. The 2023 U.S. State Department report flagged 150+ insurgency incidents in the region, often linked to cross-border support. Yunus’s China visit, where he praised Beijing’s infrastructure aid, raises red flags. Analysts at the Observer Research Foundation suggest this could be an extension of China’s Belt and Road Initiative, aiming to encircle India.
Congress spokespersons are echoing this, accusing Bangladesh of inviting China to exploit the Northeast. With 20,000+ illegal immigrants from Bangladesh reported in Assam alone (per Assam Police 2024 data), security’s already a headache. Yunus’s “landlocked” jab, though possibly a slip, implies Northeast states are isolated, which India fiercely denies—Arunachal Pradesh and others are integral, with ocean access via Kolkata and beyond. This unity across parties is rare and shows the gravity!
ALSO READ: Rising Tensions Between U.S. and Iran: What Trump’s Threats Mean for the World?
Yunus’s Full Statement – What He Really Said
Yunus said, “The Northeastern states of India, the Seven Sisters, are landlocked regions, and Bangladesh, as the guardian of the Bay of Bengal, offers a huge possibility. This could be an extension of Chinese influence, producing and marketing goods through us.” Calling India’s Northeast “landlocked” is a stretch—Nepal and Bhutan are landlocked, sure, but India’s a maritime nation with 7,500 km of coastline. Yunus’s “guardian” claim is laughable—Bangladesh’s navy, with just 6 frigates and no aircraft carriers (per IISS 2024), can’t rival India’s 150+ warships.
His invite to China feels deliberate, especially after Beijing’s Arunachal claims. Some in Bangladesh argue it was a misinterpretation, but the tone suggests otherwise. India’s response—unified condemnation from BJP, Congress, and Northeast leaders—shows this hit a nerve.
India’s Counter – Strengthening the Northeast
India’s not sitting quiet! Sarma’s push for infrastructure is gaining traction. The Kaladan project aside, the Bharatmala Pariyojana is upgrading 34,800 km of roads, including Northeast links, with a $12 billion budget (NHAI 2025). Underground tunnels? The Border Roads Organisation is exploring a 15-km tunnel under Siliguri, costing $300 million, to ensure connectivity. This counters Yunus’s narrative and China’s pressure.
Foreign policy’s also in play. Modi’s likely to skip a handshake with Yunus at the upcoming BIMSTEC Summit (scheduled April 2025), sources say. The Ministry of External Affairs called the remarks “unacceptable,” signaling a firm stance. It’s a rare moment of national unity—parties agree India must respond decisively.
ALSO READ : Stock Market Crash Fears Grip Asia as April 2 Approaches: Trump’s Tariffs and Global Tension
The Self-Goal Yunus Might Have Scored
If Yunus’s goal was to stir trouble, he’s backfired. His statement has united India—BJP, Congress, and Northeast leaders are on the same page, demanding action. Some Northeast voices even joke about “splitting Bangladesh” in retaliation, though it’s rhetoric. With 90% of Indians opposing territorial slights (per a 2024 Lokniti-CSDS survey), Yunus has handed India a rallying cry.
